I have not read of issues with the Sellita 500 movements that mimic the 7750 design, so I suspect they are good. Best if I don't comment, as it would come from ignorance and incite quartz lovers.Ī. No experience, and I am unjustly biased against quartz watches of any kind. Legibility is something I really have come to appreciate at 53 years old, YMMV.Ī. You indicated your knowledge of using the bezel for the 12-hour recording on the Nivada, and I love the coin edge. I love the flieger chronographs, and have been considering a Hanhart with the same look as the Tutima (in fact, I was surprised the dial didn't say "Hanhart" on it). I know I'm the one who's got to decide if a (mechanical) chrono is right for me, but reading other people's experiences and thoughts will help me make that decision.Īs a chronograph user and admirer, I will present my biased opinions below:Ī: Tutima, because of the pros you listed. Any other watches I should be looking at? Am I crazy for wanting a chrono, specially mechanical, if I don't necessarily have a use for its complication?Ħ. Is the action of a standard mechanical chrono a definite step up over quartz?ĥ. Is the Lemania 1873 a good movement, and worth the premium over the SW510?Ĥ. Is the 7750-based Sellita SW510 a good movement?ģ.
Have any of you had hands on experience with premium quartz chronos? Are they worth it?Ģ. Which is your favourite from the options above, and why?ġ.
.jpg "sapphire casd")
as before, mechanical chrono = expensive services, plus the fact it's from a luxury brand Ġ. lovely bidirectional rotating coin edge bezel
0 kommentar(er)
